温习问题STUDY QUESTIONS 

  1. 《圣经》里的智慧文学,和其他文化的智慧文学有什么不同?

What distinguishes the wisdom literature in the Bible from that outside of it?

  1. 『世界观』和『大叙述』这两个概念有什么不同?傅兰姆为什么认为两者都是不可或缺的?他如何回应利奥达?

What is the difference between worldview and meta-narrative?  Why does Frame think that these are indispensable?  How dos he reply to Lyotard?

  1. 归纳『基督教的世界观』。

Summarize the Christian worldview.

  1. 为什么要研究哲学?

Why study philosophy?

  1. 『神学就是基督教的哲学』。解释(解释这句话的意思);评估(你同意与否?为什么同意或不同意?)。

“Theology is Christian philosophy.”  Explain; evaluate.

  1. 对宗教一词的意义,傅兰姆和巴特有何不同?评估两者的立场。

How does Frame differ from Barth on “religion”?  Evaluate these positions.

  1. 很多人认为:宗教必须与哲学,教育,政治分离。你的看法如何?从赞成与反对两方讨论。

Many argue that religion must be separated from philosophy, education, or politics.   What do you think?  Discuss the arguments pro and con.

  1. 『没有人是真正的无神论者。』解释;评估。

“Nobody is really an atheist.”  Explain; evaluate.

  1. 『哲学家讨论的基本问题,都是宗教性的问题。』解释,举例说明。

“The basic questions of philosophers are religious in character.”  Explain, using examples.

  1. 『研究存有:就是身为存有的存有』,作这中研究为什么困难?

Why is it difficult to study “being qua being”?

  1. 宇宙为什么有事物存在(有『存有』),而不是虚无(什么都没有)?

Why is there something rather than nothing?

  1. 本章列出了大概九个形而上学的问题;你认为那一个问题对你最有吸引力?提出你自己的分析。

Of the metaphysical questions listed in this chapter, which do you find the most intriguing?  Present your own analysis.

  1. 同样地:对本章列出的知识论问题,选择一个吸引你的问题;提出你的分析。

Same for the epistemological questions.

  1. 在哲学研究中,形而上学,知识论,和价值论之间有何关连?你是否应该先学习其中一门学问,然后才研究其他?

How are metaphysics, epistemology, and value theory related in the study of philosophy?  Is there one of these that you should study before the others?

  1. 『有人会提出反对的论点:上帝与世界的绝对区分,与耶稣基督里的神人联合并不一致。』作出回应。

“Someone might object that this distinction between God and the world is not compatible with the union of God and man in Jesus Christ.”  Reply.

  1. 讨论《迦克墩信经》描述基督的神人二性时所用的四个副词。它们为什么对基督教哲学重要?

Define and discuss the four adverbs used in the Chalcedonian Declaration to describe the relation of Christ’s divine and human natures.  Why is this important for Christian philosophy?

  1. 傅兰姆说,『上帝是三位格』的教义,是《圣经》信仰独有的,是独一无二的。是如此吗?从这方面讨论某一个非基督教宗教。

Frame says that the doctrine of God’s absolute tri-personality is unique to biblical religion.  Is that true?  Consider some non-Christian religions in this regard.

  1. 范泰尔与傅兰姆如何看『三位一体』的教义,和哲学的一而众的问题之间的关系?

How do Van Til and Frame relate the doctrine of the Trinity to philosophical discussions of one-ness and many-ness?

  1. 三一真神的三个位格,和主权属性之间有什么关系?

How are the persons of the Trinity related to the lordship attributes?

  1. 解释,并评估:傅兰姆对知识论的三个视角的区别。

Explain and evaluate Frame’s distinction between three epistemological perspectives.

  1. 《罗马书》1:18-32 如何论罪对人类的知识带来的影响?对人类哲学带来的影响?举例说明:夏娃在《创世记》第三章的堕落,如何影响她的哲学。

What does Romans 1:18-32 say about the effects of sin on human knowledge?  On human philosophy?  Show how the fall of Eve in Genesis 3 affected her philosophy.

  1. 『堕落本身是道德性的,不是形而上学性的』。解释;评估。

“The fall itself was in one sense ethical and not metaphysical.”  Explain; evaluate.

  1. 『所以哲学史描述了属灵争战的一个层面。』解释;评估。

“The history of philosophy, therefore, describes one phase of spiritual warfare.”  Explain; evaluate.

  1. 从傅兰姆的长方形图表说明:两种相反的超越观和临在观。长方形的不同线条,如何表达这两种观点的关系(异同,等)?

Show on Frame’s rectangular diagram the opposing views of transcendence and immanence.  How do the lines in the diagram display the relationships between these?

  1. 说明,并评估:傅兰姆对『一而众』和『宇宙基本的构造』这些形而上学问题的回应。Describe and evaluate Frame’s responses to the metaphysical questions of “the one and the many” and the “basic composition of the universe.”
  2. 说明:上帝的主权属性与人类知识论之间有何关系。从理性主义和非理性主义诠释傅兰姆的长方形图表。

Show how the lordship attributes of God are related to human epistemology.  Expound the Frame rectangle in terms of rationalism and irrationalism.

  1. 傅兰姆说:非基督教思想,总是在理性主义和非理性主义之间摇摆。解释;评估。

Frame says that non-Christian thought vacillates between rationalism and irrationalism.  Explain; evaluate.

  1. 从伦理绝对主义和伦理相对主义来诠释傅兰姆的长方形图表。

Interpret the rectangle in terms of ethical relativism and absolutism.

  1. 说明:非基督教伦理如何违背了伦理抉择的『三视角』(这个事实)。

Show how non-Christian ethics violates the tri-perspectival character of ethical choice.

ccnci.org中华展望圣约学院 [email protected](PayPal)